摘要
2010年，最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、国家安全部、司法部联合制定并正式颁行了《关于对司法工作人员在诉讼活动中的渎职行为加强法律监督的若干规定（试行）》，从而明确了作为国家法律监督机关的检察机关，在立案查办职务犯罪等职权之外，进一步增加了对司法工作人员尚未构成犯罪但严重违反法律的职务行为进行调查并予以监督纠正的职权，这是司法改革的重要成果，对于强化检察机关法律监督职责，维护社会公平正义具有重要意义。
那么，在该规定颁行三年多的时间里，它是否如预期般在司法实践中得到有效贯彻执行？它的制度设计是否完善？对此，有必要进行深入的调研和探讨。经过调查走访，发现还有不少司法界甚至检察机关的同志，不能准确把握对司法工作人员渎职违法行为开展调查的概念，在检察实践中，它也由于执行调查主体不统一、调査程序不完善、调查处理结果保障不到位、对违法调查主体监督不明确等原因，没有被充分地运用起来，发挥它应有的积极作用。为此，本文紧密结合检察工作实际，从明确概念、统一主体、细化程序、强化处理结果保障制度、加强对调查主体的监督等方面，提出了对该规定加以规范和完善的建议，以期有利于检察机关工作人员依法、正确、全面行使该项职能，更好地履行法律监督职责。
关键词：司法工作人员；渎职违法行为；调查主体；调查程序；调查监督
Abstract
In 2010, Regulations on Strengthening the Law Supervision ofJudicial Staff's Malpractice in the Litigious Activities （Trial） waspublished jointly by the Supreme People's Court, the SupremePeople's Procuratorate, the Ministry of Public Security, the Ministryof State Security, the Ministry of Justice, which defined as theprocuratorial organ of the state organ for legal supervision, in caseinvestigation the duty crime and other functions andpowers, further increase of judicial personnel does not constitute acrime but a serious breach of duty behavior legal investigation andsupervision of the authority to correct, this is the importantachievements to judicial reform, to strengthen the prosecution oflegal supervision responsibility, the importance of maintaining socialfairness and justice.
Then, the provisions in force for over three years, it was carriedout as expected in judicial practice effectively ? The design of thesystem it is perfect? With these questions, we conducted anin-depth investigation and study. After investigation, we found thatthere were many judicial circles and even the procuratorial organ'scomrade, can not accurately grasp the concept of investigation forviolations of the judicature staff dereliction, in procuratorialpractice, it is also due to the implementation of the subject ofinvestigation is not unified, the investigation procedure is notperfect, investigation and treatment results of security is not inplace, the subject of investigation supervision not clear and otherreasons, has not been fully used up, play its active role. Therefore,this paper closely combines the actual procuratorial work, clarifiesthe concept, main body, uniform refinement procedure, strengtheningtreatment results of security system, strengthen supervision and otheraspects of the subject of investigation, put forward to regulate andperfect suggestions to the provision, in order to benefit theprocuratorial organs staff in accordance with the law, exercise thefunctions of a comprehensive, correct to better fulfill theresponsibilities of legal supervision.
Key words: The judicial staff; The illegal behavior of derelictionof duty; The main investigation; The investigationprocedure; Investigation supervision
目录
摘要
ABSTRACT
0引言
1对司法工作人员渎职违法行为开展调查的现状
1. 1检察机关幵展调查涉及的部门
1. 2检察机关开展调查的手段
1.3对司法工作人员渎职违法行为的处理方式
2对司法工作人员渎职违法行为开展调查中存在的问题
2.1对司法人员渎职违法行为开展调查的概念认识不清
2. 2执行调查的部门与职能不明确
2. 3调查程序规定存在问题
2. 4调查处理结果保障制度不到位
2.5对渎职违法调查主体的监督不明确
3完善对司法工作人员渎职违法行为开展调查的建议
3.1正确把握对司法工作人员渎职违法幵展调查的概念
3.2明确调查部门与职能
3.3细化调查程序
3.3.1完善侦查监督部门和公诉部门的提前介入程序
3.3.2细化派驻检察室的职能作用
3. 3. 3畅通人民群众对司法工作人员渎职违法行为举报的渠道
3. 4建立调查处理结果的保障机制
3.4.1强化和扩大检察机关的程序处理决定权
3.4.2明确被调查人员所在单位的配合和强制反馈义务
3.4.3完善检察机关追究渎职违法责任建议权的落实途径
3. 5构建对调查主体的监督机制
3.5.1尽快建立人民检察院案件信息公开机制
3.5.2健全完善人民监督员制度
3.5.3建构主动接受媒体监督的工作机制
3.5.4强化检察机关内部监督机制
结语
参考文献
致谢
