摘要
在全面推进以审判为中心的刑事诉讼制度改革的背景下，强调以审判阶段为诉讼制度的核心，摈弃之前司法实践中以侦查阶段为中心的旧观念。其核心要求是保护被告人的对质权。刑事被告人对质权是保护被告人诉讼权利的重要方面之一，也是当事人对抗式刑事司法制度的具体表现形式。把被告人对质权作为宪法上公平审判权的一种，不仅有益于更快的实现案件客观真实和程序公正，也有益于防止或减少冤假错案的产生。对于刑事被告人对质权的概念，简单的说，即被告人在诉讼过程中有权要求与不利于己的证人面对面质询的一种防御权。
全文着力于通过简单介绍和剖析被告人对质权制度的相关问题和知识的梳理，将文章主要分为三部分，引言、正文和结论，正文部分分为五章。本文主要采用了历史分析方法、比较分析方法、实证与案例分析方法，将从被告人对质权制度的解读出发，以被告人对质权的核心内容为主线，通过对古今中外的对质活动进行论述，从而发现被告人对质权在我国尚存在的问题。
并通过对这些问题的分析和研究提出本人的看法，使被告人的合法权益进一步得到切实、充分的保障。他山之玉，可以攻石。无论从程序正当性还是保障人权来说，被告人对质权都具有深远意义，而我国刑事立法中缺乏对被告人对质权的规范，司法实践中缺乏对被告人对质权的细化规定和对被告人基本人权的保障等问题的显现。
鉴于此，本人对被告人对质权的基本理论问题及其内容做一介绍，认为我国刑事诉讼法应当直面司法实践中存在的问题，以“精细化”为立法技术思维模式，在进一步明确被告人诉讼权利的基础上，完善被告人在法庭上的对质程序规定，以期为符合我国国情和现状，为以审判为中心的刑事司法制度改革起到抛砖引玉之效。
关键词：刑事被告人；对质权；存在问题；宪法诉讼
ABSTRACT
In the context of comprehensively promoting the trial-centered reform of thecriminal procedure system, it emphasizes that the trial stage is the core and abandonsthe old ideas centered on the investigation phase in the judicial practice. Its corerequirement is to protect the defendant's pledge. The criminal defendant is one of theimportant aspects of protecting the defendant's right of litigation and the concretemanifestation of the party's criminal justice system. The defendant on the pledge as aconstitutional right to a fair trial, not only for the faster realization of the case ofobjective truth and procedural justice, but also help to prevent or reduce theoccurrence of miscarriage of justice. For the criminal defendant on the concept ofpledge, simply said that the defendant in the course of the proceedings have the rightto ask and against the witnesses face to face a challenge.
The article focuses on the brief introduction and analysis of the defendant onthe quality of the system related issues and knowledge of the comb, the article isdivided into three parts, the introduction, the text and the conclusion, the text part isdivided into five chapters.
This paper mainly adopts the methods of historical analysis, comparativeanalysis, empirical and case analysis, starting from the defendant's interpretation ofthe pledge system, taking the defendant as the main line of the pledge of the pledge,through the discussion of the quality of the activities of ancient and modern, So as tofind the defendant on the existence of the pledge in our country. And through theanalysis and research of these issues put forward my views, so that the legitimaterights and interests of the defendant to be further effective and adequate protection.
He mountain jade, you can attack the stone. In terms of procedural legitimacyand the protection of human rights, the defendant has far-reaching significance to thepledge, and our criminal legislation lacks the standard of the defendant's pledge, thejudicial practice lacks the elaboration of the defendant's pledge and the defendantThe basic theory of human rights and other issues, in view of this, I defend thedefendant on the basic theory of the quality of the problem and its content to do anintroduction that China's criminal procedural law should face the problems injudicial practice, “fine” The legislative thinking mode of the legislation, on the basisof further clarifying the defendant's litigation right, perfect the defendant's court inthe court of the quality of the procedures, in order to meet our national conditionsand the status quo, the trial as the center of the criminal justice system reform play arole
Key Words: Criminal defendant;right pledge;existence problem;constitutionalaction
目录
引言
第1章刑事被告人对质权概述
1. 1刑事被告人对质权的概念
1. 1. 1何为对质权
1. 1. 2对质权概念的观点展示
1. 2刑事被告人对质权的核心内容
1. 2. 1证人公开宣誓
1.2.2同时到场对质
1. 2. 3审判者居中裁判
1.2.4公开证人身份
1. 3被告人对质权与相关理论
1. 3. 1被告人对质权与传闻证据规则
1.3.2被告人对质权与直接言词原则
1.3.3被告人对质权与防御权
第2章刑事被告人对质权的正当性分析
2. 1理论基础
2.1.1证据裁判原则是获得对质权的准则。
2. 1. 2符合以人为本的程序主体性原则
2. 2程序公正价值
2. 2. 1程序公正的保障性
2. 2. 2程序公正的优先性
2. 2. 3程序公正的双重性
2. 3其他制度价值
2. 3. 1道德价值
2.3.2核心价值
第3章刑事被告人对质权的发展演变
3. 1中国古代的被告人对质活动
3.1.1西周时期初步形成
3. 1. 2唐宋时期正式确立
3.1.3元代时期迅速发展
3. 1. 4建国初期日渐完善
3. 2域外的被告人对质权
3. 2. 1英美法系中关于对质权的规定
3. 2. 2大陆法系中关于对质权的规定
3. 2. 3国际人权法中关于对质权的规定
3. 3刑事被告人对质权发展对我国的启示
第4章我国刑事被告人对质权的立法与司法现状
4. 1我国刑事被告人对质权的立法
4.1.1我国根本法宪法的角度
4. 1. 2我国基本法刑事诉讼法的角度
4.1.3我国补充法刑事诉讼司法解释的角度二
4. 2我国刑事被告人对质权的司法
4. 3被告人对质权存在问题的原因分析
第5章完善刑事被告人对质权制度的建议
5. 1建立宪法诉讼制度
5.1.1宪法诉讼的概念和价值
5. 1. 2宪法诉讼制度的创建
5. 2保障被告人对质权的具体措施
5. 2. 1增加对质活动的参与人
5. 2. 2明确被告人对质权的适用阶段
5. 2. 3细化被告人对质的庭审规则
5. 2. 4规范被告人对质的适用顺序和方式
结论
致谢
参考文献
