维贝克技术道德化理论的批判(4)
时间：2017-06-20 来源：东北大学学报(社会科学版) 作者：刘铮 本文字数：9755字 然而，倘若我们换一个问法，不再问“技术物有道德吗”而是问“技术有道德吗”,或许有利于我们走出“经验转向”以来技术哲学的内在困境。也就是说，我们需要回到“技术”（τε’χνη）的源始意义上去考察，在亚里士多德的意义上界定技术是一种以善为目的的理智德性，在海德格尔的意义上界定技术是真理的发生方式，从而有助于揭示技术与伦理之间的本质同源性，技术与伦理因而并不是相互外在的两个东西。这或许就成为一种超越于“经验转向”以来技术哲学之内在困境的可能理论路径。
参考文献：
[1]Ihde D.Peter-Paul Verbeek and a PostphenomenologicalMirror[J].Philos.Technol.,2014,27:292-296.
[2]Verbeek P.Moralizing Technology:Understanding andDesigning the Morality of Things[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,2011.
[3]Verbeek P.Expanding Mediation Theory[J].Found Sci.,2012,17:391-395.
[4]Latour B.We Have Never Been Modern[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1993:9.
[5]Verbeek P.Materializing Morality:Design Ethics andTechnological Mediation[J].Science Technology &Human Values,2006,31:361-380.
[6]Kroes P,Verbeek P.Introduction:The Moral Status ofTechnical Artefacts[C]∥ The Moral Status of TechnicalArtefacts.Dordrecht:Springer Press,2014.
[7]Verbeek P.Some Misunderstandings About the MoralSignificance of Technology[C]∥ The Moral Status ofTechnical Artefacts.Dordrecht:Springer Press,2014:75-88.
[8]Peterson M,Spahn A.Can Technological Artefacts BeMoral Agents?[J].Science Engineering Ethics,2011,17:411-424.
[9]Illies C,Meijers A.Artefacts Without Agency[J].TheMonist,2009,92（3）：420-440.
[10]Peterson M.Three Objections to Verbeek[J].Philos.Technol.,2014,27:301-308.
[11]Van de Poel I.Technology as Moral Agent[J].Philos.Technol.,2012,25:615-619.
[12]Brey P.From Moral Agents to Moral Factors:TheStructural Ethics Approach[C]∥The Moral Status ofTechnical Artefacts.Dordrecht:Springer Press,2014:125-142.
[13]Pitt J.“Guns Dont Kill,People Kill”:Values in and/orAround Technologies[C]∥The Moral Status of TechnicalArtefacts.Dordrecht:Springer Press,2014:89-102.
[14]Mitcham C.Agency in Humans and in Artifacts:AContested Discourse[C]∥The Moral Status of TechnicalArtefacts.Dordrecht:Springer Press,2014:11-30.
[15]Smith D.Rewriting the Constitution:A Critique of“Postphenomenology”[J].Philos.Technol.,2015,28:533-551.
参考文献：
[1]Ihde D.Peter-Paul Verbeek and a PostphenomenologicalMirror[J].Philos.Technol.,2014,27:292-296.
[2]Verbeek P.Moralizing Technology:Understanding andDesigning the Morality of Things[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,2011.
[3]Verbeek P.Expanding Mediation Theory[J].Found Sci.,2012,17:391-395.
[4]Latour B.We Have Never Been Modern[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1993:9.
[5]Verbeek P.Materializing Morality:Design Ethics andTechnological Mediation[J].Science Technology &Human Values,2006,31:361-380.
[6]Kroes P,Verbeek P.Introduction:The Moral Status ofTechnical Artefacts[C]∥ The Moral Status of TechnicalArtefacts.Dordrecht:Springer Press,2014.
[7]Verbeek P.Some Misunderstandings About the MoralSignificance of Technology[C]∥ The Moral Status ofTechnical Artefacts.Dordrecht:Springer Press,2014:75-88.
[8]Peterson M,Spahn A.Can Technological Artefacts BeMoral Agents?[J].Science Engineering Ethics,2011,17:411-424.
[9]Illies C,Meijers A.Artefacts Without Agency[J].TheMonist,2009,92（3）：420-440.
[10]Peterson M.Three Objections to Verbeek[J].Philos.Technol.,2014,27:301-308.
[11]Van de Poel I.Technology as Moral Agent[J].Philos.Technol.,2012,25:615-619.
[12]Brey P.From Moral Agents to Moral Factors:TheStructural Ethics Approach[C]∥The Moral Status ofTechnical Artefacts.Dordrecht:Springer Press,2014:125-142.
[13]Pitt J.“Guns Dont Kill,People Kill”:Values in and/orAround Technologies[C]∥The Moral Status of TechnicalArtefacts.Dordrecht:Springer Press,2014:89-102.
[14]Mitcham C.Agency in Humans and in Artifacts:AContested Discourse[C]∥The Moral Status of TechnicalArtefacts.Dordrecht:Springer Press,2014:11-30.
[15]Smith D.Rewriting the Constitution:A Critique of“Postphenomenology”[J].Philos.Technol.,2015,28:533-551.
- 相关内容推荐
- 信息技术影响下的休闲方式探析2016-06-23
- “否定之否定”原理下人-技关系理论分析2016-08-04
- 新型生态化的技术创新观研究2016-08-04
相近分类：
- 上一篇：技术知识流动的作用因素研究
- 下一篇：自然辩证法教育从学术到理论的转化
推荐阅读
