本篇论文目录导航：
【题目】惩罚性赔偿制度在《食品安全法》中的应用研究
【导论 第一章】 《食品安全法》惩罚性赔偿的功能与存在问题
【第二章】 《食品安全法》惩罚性赔偿的适用主体
【第三章】 《食品安全法》惩罚性赔偿的主观要件
【第四章】 《食品安全法》惩罚性赔偿的违法行为
【第五章 第六章】 《食品安全法》惩罚性赔偿的范围
【结语/参考文献】食品卫生安全惩罚性赔偿法制探析结语与参考文献
目录
中文摘要
Abstract
导论
（一）论文选题的理由
（二）论文选题的意义
1、论文选题的理论意义
2、论文选题的实践意义
一、《食品安全法》惩罚性赔偿的功能与存在问题
（一）《食品安全法》惩罚性赔偿的功能
（二）《食品安全法》惩罚性赔偿存在的问题
二、《食品安全法》惩罚性赔偿的适用主体
（一）《食品安全法》惩罚性赔偿主体范围界定不明
（二）《食品安全法》惩罚性赔偿主体范围界定
1、“消费者”概念界定
2、“加工联合生产者”惩罚性赔偿责任主体的确定
3、“销售者”惩罚性赔偿责任主体的确定
（三）《食品安全法》惩罚性赔偿权利主体应扩大
三、《食品安全法》惩罚性赔偿的主观要件
（一）《食品安全法》惩罚性赔偿的主观要件规定不清
（二）《食品安全法》惩罚性赔偿的主观要件
（三）过失应当纳入惩罚性赔偿主观构成要件
四、 《食品安全法》惩罚性赔偿的违法行为
（一）违法行为适用法律依据混乱
（二）违法行为的判断标准
1、生产者违法行为判断标准---以预包装食品为例
2、销售者的违法行为
3、因果关系
（三）食品欺诈交易应当适用惩罚性赔偿
五、 《食品安全法》惩罚性赔偿的范围
（一）《食品安全法》惩罚性赔偿范围存在的问题
（二）惩罚性赔偿金计算原则与基数
（三）确定惩罚性赔偿金的参考因素
六、《食品安全法》惩罚性赔偿与相关法律之间的协调对接
（一）《食品安全法》与《消费者权益保护法》的协调
（二）《食品安全法》与《侵权责任法》的协调
结语
致谢
参考文献
中文摘要
食品安全关系着每个人生命健康。2014 年 12 月 22 日，《食品安全法（修订稿）》二审提请全国人大常委会审议。以送审稿提请审议为契机，《食品安全法》又一次成为焦点话题。惩罚性赔偿条款的修改，使现行《食品安全法》惩罚性赔偿规则重新回到人们视线。食品消费领域中，消费者处于弱势地位，无法与强大的企业抗衡。再强调平等地位平等保护，实质上是一种不平等。所以将惩罚性赔偿制度引入《食品安全法》，以高额赔偿金吓阻侵害消费者的行为再次发生，切实保护消费者的合法权益。
本文分为六个部分。导论主要阐述论文选题的理由来源，并且分析选题的实践意义与理论意义。论文第一部分是关于惩罚性赔偿功能与现存问题。认为惩罚性赔偿具有惩罚、预防等功能。通过对典型案例的分析，整理几个争论焦点，以发现我国食品安全惩罚性赔偿制度中的现存问题。第二部分是关于《食品安全法》惩罚性赔偿的适用主体问题。由于《食品安全法》第九十六条对惩罚性赔偿主体的范围界定不清，本部分以全面保护消费者利益作为出发点，界定了“消费者”的构成要件，并对加工联合生产者的责任区分进行了探究。第三部分是关于《食品安全法》惩罚性赔偿的主观要件问题。本文认为食品安全惩罚性赔偿的性质为侵权责任，建议主观过失应纳入惩罚性赔偿的构成要件，并进一步探究销售者等“明知”的认定方法。第四部分是关于食品安全惩罚性赔偿的客观要件问题。由于食品安全法对此的规定比较混乱，本文以预包装食品为例，说明判断违法行为的标准。第五部分是关于食品安全惩罚性赔偿的范围问题，主要探讨惩罚性赔偿金的计算原则与基数，分析惩罚性赔偿金的参考因素。第六部分探讨《食品安全法》惩罚性赔偿与相关法律之间的协调对接问题。
关键词：《食品安全法》 惩罚性赔偿 构成要件
Abstract
Food security is intimately connected with everyone's life health. For this reason,the Food Security Law （revised draft） 2ndtrial was submitted to the StandingCommittee of the National People's Congress for deliberation on December 22, 2014.
Thereupon, the Food Security Law has become the focus topic again, and thusrevision to terms of the punitive damages and its compensation rule under existingFood Security Law has once again returned to people's attention.In food consumptionfield, the consumers are in a weak position so that they can not contend against thepowerful enterprises. Therefore, the so-called “equal status and equal protection” isessentially a kind of inequality. Due to this reason, punitive damages has beengradually introduced into Food Security Law for the purpose of intimidating andstopping the offender conducting such act again by virtue of great number ofcompensation.
This thesis constitutes of six parts. The introduction is an elaboration to thegrounds for topic selection, as well as analysis on practical significance andtheoretical significance of the topic. The first part gives an introduction to thefunctions and existing problems of punitive damages. It conducts an analysis onfunctions of punitive damages like punishment and prevention, as well as on typicalcases and several debate focuses in order to discover current problems existing inpunitive damages system in domestic food security. The second part elaborates theapplication subject of punitive damages in Food Security Law. There is uncleardefinition on subject scope of punitive damages in Article 96 of the Food SecurityLaw. “Consumer” key components are defined starting from comprehensiveprotection of the consumers' interests. To differentiate the responsibility of jointprocessing producers is also explored in this part. The third part illuminates thesubjective elements of punitive damages in Food Security Law, and proposes toinclude subjective negligence into scope of punitive damages. The fourth partanalyzes the objective elements of punitive damages in Food Security law. There istoo much chaos in food security rules, so an example on prepackaged food is given toanalyze standard of judging illegal act. The fifth part ascertains the scope of punitivedamages in Food Security Law, as well as its computation principle, base number andreference factors of the compensation. The sixth part explores the coordination andjoint between punitive damages in Food Security Law and relevant laws.
Key words: Food Security Law punitive damages key components
