本篇论文目录导航:
【题目】强制执行效能公证法律体制探究
【第一章】赋予强制执行效力公证制度概述
【2.1】赋予强制执行效力公证债权文书的可诉性之争
【2.2】赋予强制执行效力公证债权文书范围的扩张
【2.3】公证债权文书执行审查程序及问题分析
【2.4】公证执行证书之存废辨析
【第三章】完善赋予强制执行效力公证制度的建议
【结语/参考文献】强制执行效力公证体系研究结语与参考文献
Notarization is one important judicial system of China and granting theeffectiveness of the enforcement of notarization is special force of law with theenforced execution notarial deed as one of the basis of execution as Chinese civillaw regulated. With the rapid development of China's market economy, all sorts ofconflicts of interest gets prominently day by day and the litigious cases related todisputes on claims and debts increased dramatically, bringing enormous pressure tothe grassroots people's court trial work and ask them to seek persified legal systemto help coordinate. Because of its advantage in convenience, economy, effectiveness,enforced execution Notarization system played an irreplaceable role in guarantee ofthe social credit system, maintain the security of transaction and reduce the cost ofthe realization of the creditor's rights. while at the same time targeting at therealization of balance between fairness and efficiency, effectively saved judicialresources and had an effect on reducing the pressure of court litigation cases.
Giving effectiveness of enforced notarization system is developed graduallyafter China's economic system reform, which initially established in ProvisionalRegulations of notarization and is relatively a new legal system. For quite some time,the academic circles always have considerable differences on justifiability and scopeof giving enforced notarized documents effectiveness and in the judicial practice,notarization institution and court hold different views on the verification andexecution procedure of giving notarized documents enforced effectiveness, somescholarships even questioned the Legitimacy and rationality of giving notarizeddocuments enforced effectiveness that require for further improve in legislation toand standardize in operation procedure.
This article will analyze and research on the domestic prominent hot issuesreferring to the present notarization development of China by using the method oflegal analysis and comparative analysis. Despite that giving effectiveness to theenforced notarized documents do not have Res Judicata, still it's not disputable sinceit embodies the autonomy of the parties. Appropriately expanding the scope ofenforced execution notarization documents meets the need of the development ofmarket economy in China and benefits the promotion of civil transaction safety. Inorder to improve the effectiveness of notarized documents to enforce the executionrate and effectively reduce court's litigation pressure, it's necessary to clarify theexamination function of notarization institution and the court, further standardize theenforcement procedures, while at the same time paying attention to protect thelegitimate rights and interests of the parties, giving full play to the executiondocuments as the role of transitional examination and providing procedure reliefchannel to the obligor.
To promote the development of giving effectiveness of enforcementnotarization system is the requirement from innovation of social management patternand seek persified channels to resolve civil disputes, which needs legal protectionand quality notary. Furthermore, it's necessary to perfect domestic legislation,strengthen construction of notary team to promote the healthy development of thenotarization system.
Key words: Notarization system Document evidencing creditorsEffect of enforcement Practical cases of enforced executionImprovement suggestions
目 录
导 言
第一章 赋予强制执行效力公证制度概述
第一节 赋予强制执行效力公证制度概念
第二节 赋予强制执行效力公证的特点
一、公证范围的特定性
二、债权债务的确定性
三、接受执行的自愿性
第三节 赋予强制执行效力公证制度的价值
一、赋予强制执行效力公证制度的社会价值
二、赋予强制执行效力公证制度的司法价值
第四节 赋予强制执行效力公证制度的演变
一、赋予强制执行效力公证制度的起源及国外发展现状
二、我国赋予强制执行效力公证制度的历史沿革
第二章 赋予强制执行效力公证制度中的争议 问题辨析
第一节 赋予强制执行效力公证债权文书的可诉性之争
一、公证债权文书可诉性问题的主要观点
二、公证债权文书可诉性问题分析
三、债务人权利救济途径分析
第二节 赋予强制执行效力公证债权文书范围的扩张
一、赋予双务合同强制执行效力公证可行性分析
二、赋予担保合同强制执行效力可行性分析
第三节 公证债权文书执行审查程序及问题分析
一、公证机构签发执行证书审查程序
二、法院执行审查程序
三、公证债权文书审查程序问题及分析
第四节 公证执行证书之存废辨析
一、公证执行证书概述
二、公证执行证书的质疑
三、公证执行证书存在必要性分析
第三章 完善赋予强制执行效力公证制度的建议
第一节 适当扩大赋予强制执行效力公证债权文书的范围
第二节 完善执行证书制度立法
第三节 规范公证机构过渡性审查程序
第四节 减少法院执行审查的随意性
第五节 加强公证队伍建设
一、明确公证机构定位
二、提升公证员素质
结 语
参考文献
后 记
自改革开放之后,我国公证制度得以恢复重建,随着市场经济体制改革不断深入,如今公证制度已有了长足的进步,目前我国正进入快速的社会转型期,社会经济呈现出飞速发展的势态,同时社会各种利益矛盾,尤其是物质利益矛盾凸显,民事诉讼案件呈几何级增长,公证在维护经济秩序、预防纠纷、减少诉讼方面显现出日益重要的作用,逐渐被广大人民群众所认知和接受。强制执行效力作为公证制度三大效力之一,是社会经济发展的产物,是司法权部分社会化的结果,赋予强制执行效力公证制度体现了公证的职能优势,以其便捷、经济、高效的特点,通过非诉的方式为当事人解决民事纠纷又提供了一条新的途径。近年来,人们通过选择赋予强制执行效力公证的方式保障债权实现的案件也逐渐增多,上海某区法院在 2011 年至 2013 年期间受理强制执行公证债权文书案件共有 375 件,且每年案件数都呈迅速上升趋势,其中仅 2013 年就执行了 199 件,已占到三年案件总量的一半以上。
在公证制度比较发达的西方国家,将公证喻为“没有法官的审判,不经审判的判决”.在法国,以公证文书为根据的金钱请求,无须经过法院判决便可得到执行,经公证机构签发的公证书即具有了强制执行效力,如同判决书、裁定书、调解书一样可直接申请法院执行。在我国司法实践中,公证债权文书的执行现状不容乐观,公证机构和人民法院在审查和执行程序中尚持有不同的认识,学术界对赋予强制执行效力公证制度基础性的法理问题存在着理解上分歧,就其性质和定位也持有不同的观点,造成了人民群众对公证及经其依法赋予强制执行效力的债权文书的权威性和正当性产生了质疑,从而限制了赋予强制执行效力公证制度在预防民商事纠纷、维护交易安全、构建社会诚信体系中发挥积极作用,也阻碍了制度的健康发展。
本文将对赋予强制执行效力公证制度的法理基础、制度特征以及其社会和司法价值等方面进行深入阐述,并梳理该制度在司法实践中存在的一些缺陷和问题,如强制执行公证文书可诉性、强制执行范围、法院审查程序等,在归纳分析学者们不同观点的基础上,运用民事诉讼法、实体法理论进行分析,同时借鉴国外公证制度有益经验,最后提出一些不成熟的观点和建议。希望通过对本课题的研究,对完善制度立法,化解实务操作争议,提供理论参考,为创新社会管理模式,探索化解民商事纠纷新途径,促进我国公证事业发展,发挥赋予强制执行效力公证制度优势尽一份绵薄之力。