本篇论文目录导航：
【题目】新城镇化下进城务工人员劳资纠纷问题探究
【第一章】进城农民工劳资纠纷解决策略研究引言
【第二章】城镇化进程中进城务工人群劳资纠纷困境
【第三章】城市务工人员劳资纠纷频发原因及特征
【第四章】现行城市农民工劳资纠纷破解机制的不足
【第五章】构建城市务工人员劳资纠纷多元解决机制
【结语/参考文献】新时期进城打工人员劳资纠纷研究结语与参考文献
摘要 .
伴随着新型城镇化建设的大潮，大量农村人口向城市聚集，非农产业由村入镇成为了社会发展的客观趋势。超过两亿的进城务工人员作为生产要素不断涌向城镇，成为了现今中国社会的“第三元”.其作为生产要素融入到新型城镇化建设大潮中，因其工作的临时性、流动性及亦工亦农等特征，难以被工会所吸收。1
因现有劳资纠纷处理机制的刚性冗长，进城务工人员之权益保障、公平正义需求与现阶段新型城镇化具备的社会治理能力不相适应的矛盾已十分尖锐，运用法治思维和法治方式，探究劳资纠纷解决路径，以解决涉及进城务工人员切身利益的矛盾和问题确迫在眉睫，纠纷多元解决机制是化解新型城镇化中进城务工人员劳资纠纷的可行路径。
本文共分为五章：
第一章：引言。包括研究目的及意义；国内、外的研究现状；研究方法与创新。
第二章：论证及时化解进城务工人员劳资纠纷是新型城镇化中的重大课题。该部分从党的十八大、十八届四中全会、中央城镇化工作会议及中央领导人重要讲话入手，深入理解和阐述新型城镇化，进而对新型城镇化中进城务工人员劳资纠纷进行分析和讨论。
第三章：研究进城务工人员劳资纠纷的原因及特征。重点讨论进城务工人员讨薪、工伤纠纷。该纠纷类型产生的原因主要有：1.经济原因（目的偏差，利益受损）；2.制度缺陷（行政调解缺位，利益诉求、权利救济受阻）；3.心理诱因（维权的非理性）。
第四章：探寻现有进城务工人员劳资纠纷解决机制的不足。以笔者亲自代理的劳资纠纷案例为蓝本，重点阐述纠纷解决程序过于繁复、“裁审”关系的衔接维度不清、社会力量对进城务工人员支撑不足等现阶段处理劳资纠纷所存在的问题，揭示出现行劳资纠纷争议解决机制的不足。即对“法治中国”这一“新背景”重视不够，法不责众损害司法权威；对进城务工人员这一“新群体”的“新纠纷”具备的组织性、突发性、破坏性认识不足；对提高维护进城务工人员稳定能力的具体措施不多，现有解决机制适用范围不明，衔接维度不清。
第五章：建构新型城镇化中进城务工人员劳资纠纷多元解决机制。以“枫桥经验”为蓝本，充分发挥农民工工会、社区组织、法律援助组织等在维护进城务工人员稳定中的作用，就地治理社会治安。整合政策、法律与民间习惯，特别关注中华“和”文化与法治中国建设之间的衔接，求同存异，定纷止争。
以司法裁判为中心，发挥人民调解、行政调解、法律援助等各种机制优势，注重新媒体时代的舆论引导；防微杜渐，主动出击，避免事态扩大；对于已经发生的纠纷，厘清、重视“裁审”关系模式的优势及其二者之间的衔接维度，加强仲裁委员会与法院的沟通协调，能裁则裁，当判则判，绝不姑息纵容；纠纷的生效判决必须不折不扣地执行，以维护法治权威，保障劳资纠纷当事人的合法权益。
关键词：新型城镇化；进城务工人员；劳资纠纷；多元解决机制。
Abstract .
Along with the new tide of urbanization, a large number of rural population tourban agglomerations, non-agricultural industries from the village into the townbecame an objective trend of social development. More than two hundred million ofmigrant workers continue to flock to the town as a factor of production, has become amodern Chinese society, “the third element.” Their integration as a factor ofproduction to the new tide of urbanization, because of temporary liquidity and othercharacteristics of worker and peasant work, it is difficult to be absorbed by the union.
Due to economic factors, institutional deficiencies, psychological incentives andother reasons, it is often due to the payment of wages, personal injury and otherproblems in the actual labor dispute process. Migrant workers in labor disputes in thenew urbanization and therefore presents a new feature, namely the transformation ofcollectivization of labor relations, reflecting the type of dispute has not only limited toindividual workers and businesses, more reflected in the workers' collective andbetween enterprises; Judging from the regional distribution, occurred in economicallydeveloped coastal areas; the layout of the industry, mostly concentrated in thegenerally low profits, the competition is fierce traditional manufacturing; changes inthe age structure of the labor force, such feed City workers in the city not only has theexperience of life, more higher education, a considerable part of the new generationof migrant workers to learn the basics of the law, with a strong sense of entitlement.
In the face of the employer payment of wages, workers' compensation and otherdispute resolution is not the time, they are easier to organize themselves in order tovent their discontent against injustice. Rights of the non-rational, legal assistance andadministrative mediation out of position and the current “one cut two trial” rigidlengthy processing mechanism derived from “the rule of law in China” and“harmonious society” and many unstable factors of disharmony.
Due to the rigidity of the existing lengthy labor dispute handling mechanism, toprotect the rights and interests of migrant workers, the justice needs and stage newurbanization are incompatible with the social governance has been very sharp contradictions, the use of the rule of law and the rule of law and the way of thinking,inquiry dispute resolution paths to solve the vital interests of migrant workersinvolved in the conflicts and problems indeed imminent, diverse dispute settlementmechanism is to resolve the new urbanization of migrant workers in labor disputesfeasible path.
This paper is divided into five chapters.
Chapter One: Introduction. Including research purpose and meaning; domesticand foreign research status; the research methods and innovation.
Chapter Two: Demonstration of migrant workers in a timely manner to resolvelabor disputes in the new urbanization is a major issue. The section from eighteen,eighteen Fourth Plenary Session of the Central Work Conference urbanization andimportant speech of the party's central leadership, deeply understand and elaboratenew urbanization, and then on the new urbanization of migrant workers in labordisputes analysis and discussion.
Chapter Three: study causes and characteristics of migrant workers in labordisputes. Focus on migrant workers pay talks, injury disputes. The main reason forthis type of disputes arising are: an economic reason （purpose bias, interest impaired）；2 system defects （absence of administrative mediation, interest demands, the right torelief blocked）； 3 psychological incentives （activist irrational）。
Chapter Four: Exploring existing migrant workers lack the mechanism to resolvelabor disputes. In the author personally agents modeled labor dispute cases, focusingon dispute resolution procedures are too complicated, cohesion dimension, “theCommission” relationship is unclear, inadequate social forces of migrant workers andother support staff handle this stage the problems of labor disputes, labor disputesappear to reveal rows inadequate dispute resolution mechanisms. Namely, “the rule oflaw in China” this “new context” inadequate attention, Fa Bu Ze Zhong underminejudicial authority; for migrant workers in this “new group” and “new dispute” with theorganization, sudden, destructive lack of knowledge; few concrete measures toimprove the maintenance of a stable ability of migrant workers, the scope of the existing settlement mechanism is unknown, cohesion dimension unclear.
Chapter Five: Construction of new urbanization in diverse migrant workers labordispute settlement mechanism. In “Midnight Experience” modeled on migrantworkers into full play the role of trade unions, community organizations, legal aidorganizations, such as migrant workers in the maintenance of stability in situmanagement of social security. Integration of policies, laws and folk customs, specialattention convergence China “and” Culture and the rule of law among Chineseconstruction, seek common ground, settling disputes. To the administration of justiceas the center, take advantage of the various mechanisms of people's mediation,administrative mediation, legal aid, focusing on public opinion to guide the newmedia era; a preventive measure, to take the initiative, to avoid worsening of thesituation; for disputes have occurred, to clarify, emphasis on “the Commission”cohesion dimension relationship patterns between the two advantages and strengthencommunication and coordination with the Court's arbitration committee, to cut the cut,when the judge will sentence, not appeasement; effective judgment disputes mustfully implement to uphold the authority of the rule of law, protect the legitimate rightsand interests of the parties to a labor dispute.
Keywords: New Urbanization. Diverse Migrant Workers. Labor Dispute. Settlement Mechanism.
目录
一 引言
（一）研究目的及意义
（二）国内外研究现状
1. 国内研究现状
2. 国外研究现状
（三）存在问题
（四）研究方法与创新
二 新型城镇化中进城务工人员劳资纠纷
（一）新型城镇化建设的现状
（二）新型城镇化中进城务工人员劳资纠纷的现实困境
三 新型城镇化中进城务工人员劳资纠纷频发原因及特征
（一）新型城镇化中进城务工人员劳资纠纷频发的原因
1. 经济因素
2. 制度缺陷
3. 心理诱因
（二）新型城镇化中进城务工人员劳资纠纷特征
1. 劳动关系结构的改变
2. 进城务工人员诉求的改变
3. 劳资纠纷在地域、行业上的特征呈现
4. 用人单位人事变动的频繁性
5. 劳动者年龄结构的变化
6. 劳资纠纷的集体化
四 现行进城务工人员劳资纠纷解决机制的不足
（一）纠纷解决程序过于繁复
（二）“裁审”关系的衔接维度不清
（三）社会力量对进城务工人员支撑不足
五构建新型城镇化中进城务工人员劳资纠纷多元解决机制
（一）完善现行劳资纠纷“裁审”关系模式
（二）加强法律援助完善公益诉讼
（三）“对立消除型”调解模式的应用
1. 基层调解
2. 行政调解
3. 仲裁调解
4.司法调解
结语
参考文献
致谢
